Panels: Where’s the Contrarian? You’re Boring the Audience

Post image for Panels: Where’s the Contrarian? You’re Boring the Audience

Speaker panels nowadays seem to bring together like-minded individuals on a topic they feel passionate about. They work together to produce content, answer questions and bring awareness.

But where’s the contrarian?

As Edward Boches pointed out last week, panels like that “bore the hell out of their audience.” (kudos to EB for the blog topic idea.)

Do panels come together based on similar thought because a.) they want to look knowledgeable and b.) they don’t want to flounder on stage if in debate form?

True creativity and passion comes out when you have to push the restraints ‘inside the box’ – other ideas that make you think past what you believe to be the case, and reach a compromise (or not) that will show your audience both sides of the coin. Are you cheating yourself and the industry if you don’t have challenges?

David Spinks and I rarely agree – it’s what makes #u30pro work so well. What we do agree on is presenting knowledge to our community and providing feedback. Brilliance comes in all shapes and form, and those that you surround yourself with shouldn’t all be clones of thought.

The creative brainstorm should bring all levels of thought, because even the most simple solution can turn into something big. A contrarian isn’t a bully, even if that’s the portrayal. Some of the best ideas come from an individual’s idea foundation, and built upon by a contrarian. Instead of A to B, you are doing A to B + C.

So what should happen behind the scenes? Many presume compromise is always the name of the game, but let’s work on that. What can we do to fix it?

Present your Opinion with Class

There is no reason that you have to be an arrogant ogre when stating thought. Pick out 1-2 areas that stand out with other panel speakers, and build upon it. Engage with the moderator and ask best practices. It’s very easy to turn an idea that someone had and present it as if the conclusion was reached together. Think of it as more educating and enhancing an idea, rather than educating the ignorant. You might learn something too.

Stand for your Opinion

At the end of the day, you represent your agency/corporation and yourself. Every presentation that you make has an underlying tag of your brand (both company and personal) on it. If what you’re saying doesn’t jive with what the brand stands for, or what you tell clients? You’re doing it wrong. Don’t be intimidated, and don’t go with the crowd. You have great ideas, so show them.

He Said, She Said

There aren’t any rules to panel speaking that say you have to present one concise thought. Talk with your fellow presenters and see what they think about two differing opinions answering a question. Have a ‘partner’ on your panel, and if one person is asked a question, they can then say ‘But John has a few thoughts on a different approach’ and pass the mic.

Think of it this way: You are there to educate and engage with an audience. The spotlight isn’t on you. A panel is a group of individuals whose minds on a similar topic need to be knowledgeable and interesting.

Similar thought doesn’t drive those results – you just aren’t pushing each other as much.

Do you agree? Disagree? What type of panels do you enjoy listening to?

Dig what you read? Share with others:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Posterous
  • Twitter
  • Ha. I don't even get on panels :P
  • laurenfernandez
    Well, I know of some opportunities that were offered to you. :)
  • Not a bad thing. :)
  • I think the contrarian is not only missing from panels, it's missing from the larger communications conversation through social media. Very few people are willing to refute the philosophical thoughts from others. Is it because we don't have a lot of data telling us that our logic is [potentially] flawed? It doesn't take a lot of energy to agree - just nod and smile and everybody thinks you're a genius...right? I think there's some of that going on with panels. When a logical idea is presented, everybody jumps on board.

    At the core of the issue, the conversation needs to move forward. Disagreement doesn't always get that job done. The need for elaboration is just as important as disagreement when it comes down to philosophical or logical positions. Like you said, enhance the conversation and reach a mutual agreement to educate those around you.
  • laurenfernandez
    Yeah, but you get hte joy of seeing Spinks and I disagree all the time. :)

    It's easier to agree with those that are "leaders" of the field than to challenge thought. However, if you can challenge thought and provide back-up, it can lead to a great conversation. I wish more people viewed that as a good practice. Don't disagree just to disagree, but try to push each other beyond limits.
  • In addition to what you said, Lauren, most of the true thought leaders in the social space welcome opposing viewpoints. It's a chance to strengthen their viewpoint or back off and realize the logic behind the other side - it's the thoughtless arguments that suck energy. Nobody wins when ego (or ego-stroking) allows propagation of less-than-effective ideas.
  • Couldn't agree more, Scott (ironically). There's way too much of the back patting and ego stroking in "social media". The moment you stand up and question somebody or express difference to somebody, they shun you.

    Bryan mentioned the post from Ryan Stephens below but I'm mentioning it again because it's an AWESOME post (the comments are even better) and totally relevant to Lauren's post here.

    Let's all do ourselves (and the community) a favor, and start questioning. Start interacting with those that don't share your viewpoint. If we lived in a world where everybody preferred only red or only blue, it'd be a pretty dull landscape.
  • laurenfernandez
    Why is that an ironically?

    Communities are only as great as the conversation around them. If you are just going with the flow, it doesn't add anything. Either strengthen the argument, build on it or challenge it. It makes for much better conversation.
  • I thought it was ironic because this is a post about contrarians and I was agreeing with Scott. :)

    And I completely agree with you too, Lauren. Strengthening, building, and challenging all make much better conversations, and help all involved in the conversations more than simply just floating along.

    Now we just need to keep encouraging it!
  • Great post and I agree that in many cases it is much more exciting to have a panel with many differing view points. I specifically remember attending a Social Media Club SF panel about "Who Owns Social Media" (as in PR, Marketing, IT, etc.) that had some lively opinions all around. These types of panels are great for opening peoples' minds, pushing boundaries, and getting my brain churning with new ideas. Especially for topics that I have a good understanding of already.

    In other cases though I can see that a panel can work differently and still be effective and useful. A panel can also be structured around a similar opinion but then each presenter is able to give their personal case examples, with more detailed ideas about what may work in their field or their particular experience. These to me would be more specific "teaching" panels, where I can gain real life examples to build upon. I certainly see the value in this as well. It may not be as lively or exciting but I think it adds value, especially for those who are just starting out learning about the particular topic and need a baseline from which to build upon.
  • laurenfernandez
    I'm glad that you pointed out the other side of things. I like the idea of presenting different case studies and key learnings - it makes for a much better presentation.

    Building upon real life examples and having key takeaways is what will make the difference. Thanks for sharing!
  • I have not had the opportunity to attend many panels to date, but I can definitely see the trend of there being no contrarian. It is almost like each person is there to share a few points and all the others support them in case they forget a point.

    Are panels just an unprepared group presentation? Seriously, it is a pretty sweet deal -- No pre-preparation other than what you have naturally learned from experience and you get to sit down. Talk about comfort (physically and mentally)!

    I think panels should be more like a court room. It should be the organizers responsibility to find people with different ideals. If you are on the panel, why not take it upon yourself to bring up points on the other end of the spectrum?

    I am assuming that Edward is referring to so some sort of marketing or SM panels he has attended. I can understand why the 'big names' in these fields tend to fly like a squad of geese.

    -Each of them has branded themselves with a message that they make it hard for themselves to convey any thought that tells otherwise.
    -The other people on the panel are probably peers and do not want to embarrass them or be embarrassed by them.
    -To be honest, they are all probably presenting other presentations that week and may not want to do the extra work. It is more about getting through the event and providing a panel than what is actually being said.

    I think all bloggers should image every blog post like a panel question. Rather than just give your thoughts -- think, how can I add the most to the conversation? If this is not making too much sense, here is a great debate between Carlos Miceli and I on RyanStephensMarketing.com:

    http://ryanstephensmarketing.com/blog/how-to-sway-drones-kill-the-queen-bee-take-over-the-hive/

    I'll admit, it got a little heated but it was all in good fun! What I am trying to illustrate is that I read Ryan's post and instantly knew that EVERYONE would agree with him. I wanted to have a little fun and attempt to illustrate the point that 'Drones' ARE needed on Twitter. It was tough, but I think everyone got more out of the discussion!

    Great post Lauren!
  • laurenfernandez
    I think the best bloggers know how to present a topic with enough open ended and questions that a debate such as that can happen.

    When putting together panels, its easy to take on the mentality of "Let's reach a compromise. I might look more intelligent if I go with the crowd." Also, time is a factor. There isn't a lot of time to meet with the panel, put together efficient content and really drive the point.

    That's why the time is extremely valuable - and you should stick up for opinions whenever possible. You can really push each other, and the panels I have been on have a contrarian.

    I've been in that role, and I position it as I only present information I believe in. It's not fair to my agency or the brands I represent if I go against it.
  • The conversation going on over at Ryan's blog is awesome. It's important to remember that stirring up the pot for the sake of fostering conversation is ok, but stirring up the pot just to piss people off or just for the sake of stirring isn't very productive.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: