We’ve all had that thought: I wish I had that confidence. I wish I had that name recognition. I wish I had that *insert whatever quality you don’t have here.*
I was somewhat joking when I named this post “I wish I were Stuart Foster” because if you know either of us, we are similar – which is probably a big reason why we get along so well. Stu is the first person, though, that I’ve stepped back and thought “Wow, I wish I could be that blunt and assertive.” Dang Southern manners.
In the PR world, we are constantly around other people that recognize our work internally. Therefore, many of our interactions – competitive or not – are with our peers. It only makes sense that we evaluate ourselves based off the industry and thought leaders. Your definition of a thought leader is probably different than mine. I work with different people on different issues. For example, David Spinks and Kasey Skala are my go-to guys for anything under 30 – and just to laugh.
Something I continue to struggle with is confrontation and telling people exactly what I think. I tend to put other people’s needs first and address my own much later. Is this a bad thing? No. I’ve made it work for me and the type of work environment I want to be in. Isn’t the whole point of mentors to cultivate your strengths, identify your weaknesses and try to change? Many of my mentors spawn because of an issue I struggle with. Their intelligence and guidance helps to shape me.
So is it better to change something about you based off of what you see in others that is successful? Or do you cultivate your own strengths in your environment? Does the approach vary by person?