Understanding Communications Breakdowns

Post image for Understanding Communications Breakdowns

photo credit: science blogs

LAF Note: This guest post was written by Jason Falls. All together now: “Heh.”

When you face a communications breakdown, whether it’s between two people or even two companies, you can almost always blame one thing for the problem: Assumptions. There’s a reason for the clever reminder, “You know what happens when you assume?” (For those unfamiliar, the rhetorical answer is, “You make an A-S-S out of U and ME.”)

Think about the last time you had a spat with a friend. The problem likely stemmed from the fact you assumed she meant one thing when she really meant another, he assumed you were going to handle that part of the project or you assumed they would be okay with you bringing the third party along.

While the layers of complication are greater, company communications breakdowns are no different. Let’s say you are a public relations account manager and you want to approach a super cool, web start-up company with a partnership for one of your clients. You assume they’re interested in your client’s money so you make the calls only to be frustrated with a lack of response or interest.

What you didn’t know is that the web start-up business model has nothing to do with finding revenue from advertising or corporate sponsorships. Web start-ups normally are interested in driving members, not revenue. Their end-game is to sell to a bigger company for millions, not sell ad space for thousands.

You know what happens when you assume?

I’ve had a friend frustrated with me before that I didn’t respond quickly to a direct messages she sent me on Twitter. But her frustration went away when she realized I was on a four-hour flight without access, or perhaps in a client meeting with my phone and computer turned off. Assuming I’m sitting at my computer with Tweetdeck up monitoring my direct messages all the time … you know what happens when you do that?

Probably the best business advice I ever received was a basic tenant of good communications: Think like the other guy and you’ll be more successful dealing with them.

The, “walk a mile in their shoes,” approach gives you a different perspective on the conversation, negotiation or situation. It helps you see why your message wasn’t clear, didn’t persuade or fell short in accomplishing what you were looking to do.

So the next time you’re frustrated with the lack of response, upset with someone for their attitude or something they said, step back, remove emotion from the equation and put yourself in their shoes. Consider factors other than their intent, or lack thereof. If you do, you’ll quickly find fewer communications breakdowns in your own relationships, personal or otherwise.

Jason Falls assumes this post will be useful for you. If not, you can file complaints with him via Twitter (he’s @JasonFalls) or on his blog at SocialMediaExplorer.com.

Dig what you read? Share with others:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Posterous
  • Twitter
  • Danny Brown
    Take a breath and count to ten. Especially if you're assuming via social media. There's a lot of entitlement appearing online, with people expecting immediate responses regardless of time, place and reason. But like you say - think of your own job or position. Do you reply immediately every time? Do you always have every single answer to a question?

    Probably not. So assuming others do is kinda... assumptive.
  • JasonFalls
    I was going to no reply just for fun, but figured that'd be rude. Good reinforcements, DB. Thanks for that.
  • Danny Brown
    What's the phrase that would fit here? Oh yeah - "hehe" ;-)
  • Jason Sprenger
    Yes, great point. Communications is a two-way street...we don't often think about the receiver of the message.

    Another way this comes to light is in manager/subordinate relationships. How many times have we done a project and turned it into our boss, only to have them come back and say they wanted it to have a different look, or be done a different way? It's incredibly important for managers to be almost over-detailed about the work they delegate and the way they describe the end result they want to see, and it's also important (it's a two-way street, remember) for workers to ask questions of their managers and be absolutely sure they know what they're supposed to do, how they're supposed to do it, what their deadline is, etc. All of these little things count, and they save time and energy in the end.
  • JasonFalls
    Excellent additional thoughts. Lots of employee stress would probably disappear if they (and their managers) communicated more efficiently.
  • Tom O'Keefe
    Great advice, Jason. Changing your perspective does so much for communication and understanding.

    I agree with Norcross. So often, people just don't adequately articulate what their expectations are, leading to letdowns and breakdowns. Hash it out before you start anything, ask questions, and give clear answers. Obviously, you can't cover everything, but if you make an effort to begin with, both parties will be more willing to understand "mistakes" because you've already given each other a window into your perspective through discourse.

    In other words, make your perspective as available as possible.

  • JasonFalls
    Agreed. Thanks for the thoughts, Tom.
  • Norcross
    How often is the breakdown due to people's inability to clearly outline what they want / expect in a given transaction? Using your example of the twitter DMs, your friend had the expectation that you would be monitoring (perhaps even anticipating) her message. Did she give you any sort of heads up that it should be coming?
  • JasonFalls
    Great point. Outlining expectations is a key factor, but can also be damning. If she had DM'd me with "I need you to respond if you're interested by noon tomorrow," but I was off-line until 1 p.m. tomorrow, there's still a breakdown. It wasn't that I wasn't, it was that I wasn't aware. Good thoughts, though. Thanks for commenting.
  • Norcross
    Leaving out the fact that if something is important and time-sensitive, a twitter DM is hardly the appropriate tool to use, I think it often filters down to a lot of folks feeling entitled to my time, when that may or may not be the case. To use your example, if someone sends me a DM or email, but I'm having dinner with my wife or playing with my son, short of the world being on fire I am not going to respond. Expectations and priorities go hand in hand.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: