Blogging v. Representation – the PR Case
Does it come down to the 1st Amendment v. corporate policy? Or is there more to it…..
As a PR professional – whether it’s in a corporate, agency, association or non-profit setting – we represent a brand/product/client etc. As blogging becomes more popular, many of us are blogging about issues that can relate to anything in the PR world.
So, here’s my question – where’s the line? Do you only talk about certain topics on your blog? Should a supervisor be able to tell you what you can and can’t blog about?And if you do blog about something they don’t agree with, can they request that you close down your blog?
Sure, it’s a free country, but we always have to keep in the back of our mind the effect that any writing will have. We also can’t be scared to discuss issues of importance. Here’s my theory – it’s all in how you present it. If you present a well-constructed argument and can back it up, I don’t see why you can’t blog about it. For every blog post you write, you should be able to print it out and post it somewhere in your office for all to see – and not worry about being embarassed or casting a shadow on the client. In the PR business, it is all about representation – and posting thoughtful posts isn’t a bad thing. If you slander something related to the field, sure, it probably won’t go over well.
My suggestion is to have an open door policy with your boss about blogging. If you plan to personal blog, talk it over with them. Let them know that it’s out there, what you want to accomplish with it, and if there is a controversial topic, let them know about it. It’s better to be prepared so they aren’t taken off guard. Disclaimers are great, but sometimes people don’t read them. Are they a good idea to have? Absolutely. Everything you have online can be linked back to your employer.
-
ChetG
-
Inkognegro
-
jaywalk1
-
Laura Fernandex
-
jaywalk1
-
R. Pulvino
-
Laura Fernandex
-
Laura Fernandex
-
Angela
-
Kasey Skala
-
Laura Fernandex